Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Brunow's avatar

Chris, I would like to note another objectionable aspect of the current finance disclosure laws. Did you see that your state senator wrote checks TO the state party for $771,250? Whether designed to obscure the flow of political funds or not, state Senator A accepts the donation and forwards it for redistribution through the state party. The result is a laundering of the donation (in terms of financial clarity, a way to tie politicians more closely to the party organization using the redistribution, and in many cases funds being taken from rural areas to be spent in metropolitan areas. Both Republicans and Democrats are doing this. My state Senator was not on the ballot in 2022. The Senator’s campaign disclosure reports showed he sent $42,000 to the Iowa Republican Party of $43,500 raised.

I view it as a form of chicanery. I encourage people to view the reports available from the Iowa Ethics and Campaign Disclosure Board. Call out the politicians who play this game.

Expand full comment
Lora Fraracci's avatar

This vegetarian is not offended by your statement. This is not a knock on tofu or vegetarianism. This vegetarian understands the assignment. For the purposes of this conversation we're talking about someone who is fake. This is not a knock on fake meat, lol. But that would probably be another article. Yeah we've got some fake ass democrats here. My youngest daughter moved to la two years ago. With no intention of ever coming back. Why would she? California may have its problems but the push there is not towards ethanol. And her uterus has more rights than a gun. Not to mention the pool of men.... Oh, and to continue with this PCness, this is not a knock on men....

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts